Do you think Japan and Iceland and all the other politics will work together? -

I forgot the name of it, though they plan on fixing the earth and cutting down greenhouse gases by the year 2050. The council has the leaders of Idiotland (America), Japan, and all of the richest nations in the world (Why is Idiotland in it then?) Do you think their plan will work? They are also trying to cut back on burning food for oil.

Yes, like oil and water. Peace

There are a lot of nations, mostly island nations and coastal nations, that are really going to suffer tremendously from the rising of the ocean levels. I can think of what will happen to one of my particularly favorite nations, The Netherlands, and it makes me shudder. It was pretty much proven that greenhouse gases are causing the earth s climate to get hotter. There is NO disputing that unless you re a Republican that can t read or think logically. Be that as it may, we got CFC s removed when we discovered it was eating our ozone layer and now we can see that it s actually growing back. Our planet is very capable of healing itself provided you don t overload it, and we are definitely capable of overloading it now. The politics must work to solve these problems, or we won t have to worry about it, because we ll all be dead. The ecology is a very sensitive system and we can definitely screw it up irrevocably. And, um, if you want to start calling nations Idiotland, you have a whole lot of other nations in the list ahead of the US. Be fair in your assessment. China is now the biggest producer of greenhouse gases, and India will soon surpass the US as well.

I think you mean the Kyoto Protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Proto... No I don t think it will work. They re all content to blame the United States for not signing on. But soon, India, China and other rapidly industrializing nations will far surpass feul consumption and pollution of the U.S. They ve basically signed on that they agree with the idea of reducing pollution emissions. But they haven t come up with a way to actually implement it and actually reduce emissions. The U.S. is the only one who came out and said they won t support it because the plan as offered doesn t work, and to come back and offer something that does work. (Leave it to quot;Idiotlandquot; to push for real results instead of false promises.) Added: Here s a new story from the July 9, 2008 PBS NEWS Hour, on the latest meeting between G-8 nations, and the problems and strategy needed to come up with a universal international agreement. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environme... (link to text transcript, and link also to video of the story)

That one is just bull to me because they agreed to reduce greenhouse gasses by the year 2050---giving themselves over 40 years---meaning that none of them will seriously do anything.....besides, I ve heard reports that statet that if we do nothing within the next 10 years it will be too late---and the latest reports of the melting ice on the northpose and southpole are indicators that things are happening faster than expected--so basically I believe that it is too late already, the earth will be a goner by the year 2040.....

This is meaningless because China and India whose emmissions have increased exponentially in recent years won t get on board. Your name is text-book ironic.

no i dont because no government can get along wit each other there like totalers